article
The NY Existing Building Code Mistake Costing Clients Six Figures—Are You Charging Enough? Regulatory gaps in aging New York buildings drive costly change orders once permits hit. Many lawyers overlook this until a project stalls.
The NY Existing Building Code Mistake Costing Clients Six Figures—Are You Charging Enough? is a risk overlooking outdated compliance assumptions. This gap identifies where current plans violate current rules, exposing clients to expensive redesigns and delays. Studies indicate proactive reviews prevent six-figure loss.
Why does this mistake quietly raise project costs? Legacy systems often conflict with updated energy and accessibility requirements. Teams skip detailed code mapping to save time, then pay later. Research shows structured early audits cut change orders sharply.
One-line takeaway Always budget for deep code gap analysis before schematic design to protect margins.
Q: When should you flag this risk to clients? Flag it at first site review if original plans reference older rules.
Q: How can a lawyer profit from this check? Offer phased audits, clearly tying reduced risk to transparent value and saved budgets.
